Does the administrative process of restoration of rights threaten the substantial rights of children and their parents?

Authors

  • Pedro Luis Lizcano Amezquita Fundación Universitaria Juan de Castellanos

Keywords:

Administrative process of restoration of rights, Custody and personal care, Deliberation of rights, Gender equity, Best interests of the child, Measures to restore rights

Abstract

The administrative process of restoration of rights, is an administrative procedural institution headed by the Colombian Family Welfare Institute (ICBF), acronym in Spanish of “Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar”, designed to ensure effective protection of the best interests of the child. This instance empowers family to advocate imposing measures to protect and restore the rights of children, guided by integral concepts of an interdisciplinary group of professionals at the service of the ICBF. However, many of the imposed measures do not obey any objective criteria; and, due to the discretional nature of the motivation of these decisions, on many occasions fundamental rights of children and parents are broken. The principle of best interest must prevail in all procedural actions involving decisions affecting, modifying or restricting the rights of children and are determined by considerations of proportionality, rationality and necessity so that they can effectively guarantee their rights. These measures, apparently discretionary, cannot discriminate or break the fundamental rights of the parents; and may result in the establishment of custody and personal care of the child in the head of their biological father or in the foster parents. Otherwise, the substantial rights of the subjects involved would be seriously and irremediably affected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pedro Luis Lizcano Amezquita, Fundación Universitaria Juan de Castellanos

Abogado, Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino. Magíster en Derecho Internacional, Inversiones y Comercio, Universidad de Chile. LL.M International LLM, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg-Alemania. Ph.D. (c) Universität Viadrina- Alemania. Docente, Fundación Universitaria Juan de Castellanos. Docente, Fundación Universitaria Cervantina San Agustín.

References

Alexy, R. (2002). Epílogo a la Teoría De Los Derechos Fundamentales. Revista española de derecho constitucional, 22(66), 13-64.
Borrero García, C. (2006). Derechos Humanos: Ideas y Dilemas para animar su comprensión. Bogotá. Editorial Fundación Centro de Investigación y Educación Popular.
Higuera, D.M. (2012). Bloque de constitucionalidad en Colombia: una propuesta de rigor y garantía. Madrid. Editorial Académica Española.
Lizcano, P.L. (2014). El juicio de ponderación para la protección de los derechos fundamentales de los niños. Revista Derecho y Realidad, (24), 5-28.
Jurisprudencia

CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (12 de Julio de 2011) Sentencia T- 557 de 2011. Magistrado Ponente María Victoria Calle Correa.
CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (21 de Junio de 2000) Sentencia C-734 de 2000. Magistrado Ponente Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa.
CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (19 de Junio de 2003) Sentencia T-510 de 2003. Magistrado Ponente Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa.
CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (26 de Agosto de 2009) Sentencia T-573 de 2009. Magistrado Ponente Nilson Pinilla.
CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (25 de Julio de 2011) Sentencia T-580 A de 2011. Magistrado Ponente Mauricio Gonzales Cuervo.
CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL DE COLOMBIA. (3 de Diciembre de 2014) Sentencia
T-942 de 2014. Magistrado Ponente Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez.
CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA DE COLOMBIA, Sala Civil (19 de Abril de 2017).
Sentencia TC-5357 2017. Magistrado Ponente Jorge Luis Quiroz Alemán.

Normatividad

Constitución Política de Colombia. (4 de Julio de 1991). Asamblea Nacional Constituyente.
Congreso de Colombia. (8 de Noviembre de 2006). Ley de Infancia y dolescencia. Ley 1098 de 2006. Diario Oficial 46.446.

Published

2017-11-27

How to Cite

Lizcano Amezquita, P. L. (2017). Does the administrative process of restoration of rights threaten the substantial rights of children and their parents?. Global Iure, 5, 133–154. Retrieved from https://revista.jdc.edu.co/giure/article/view/369

Issue

Section

Artículo de reflexión